A randomized controlled trial comparing surgical excisional biopsies using CO2 laser, Er:YAG laser and scalpel
International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Jun 27, 2019
Suter VGA, et al. - In this randomized controlled trial, researchers compared excisional biopsies of fibrous hyperplasia performed using a CO2 laser (140 Hz, 400 μs, 33 mJ), Er:YAG laser (35 Hz, 297 μs, 200 mJ, air–water cooling), or scalpel (15c blade). Duration of the intervention, intraoperative bleeding, need for electrocauterization and/or suturing, postoperative side effects, complications, pain, and intake of analgesics were recorded clinical parameters. Compared to the scalpel, the duration of the intervention was significantly shorter for both lasers. With the CO2 laser, intraoperative bleeding occurred less frequently. For excisional biopsies of small lesions in the oral mucosa, CO2 laser, Er:YAG laser, and scalpel are all suitable. While postoperative morbidity of the patient is similar, the ideal tool can be selected based on the preferred surgical advantages for the individual situation.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries