A comparison of 4-year total medical care costs, adverse outcomes, and opioid/prescription analgesic use for 3 knee osteoarthritis pain treatments: Intra-articular hyaluronic acid, intra-articular corticosteroids, and knee arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Feb 29, 2020
Mackowiak J, et al. - A retrospective analysis of an insurance claims database was designed to compare the medical costs associated with treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA): intra-articular corticosteroids (ICS) and intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IHA) primarily, and ICS/IHA vs knee arthroplasty (TKA) secondarily. The total allowed medical costs, claims for pre-specified, treatment-related adverse outcomes and costs, and opioid and/or prescription analgesic use and costs were the main outcome measures. Of the 260,828 individuals who selected, 126,831 were taking monotherapy (IHA=3,703, ICS=117,588, TKA = 5,540). The results of this research indicated that individuals in the IHA cohort had lower total medical care costs, fewer adverse outcomes, and lower use/costs of opioids and prescription analgesics vs individuals in the ICS and TKA cohorts. When selecting therapies for patients with knee OA, decreasing total medical care costs and minimizing opioid/analgesic use should be a treatment goal.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries