• Profile
Close

A comparison of 4-year total medical care costs, adverse outcomes, and opioid/prescription analgesic use for 3 knee osteoarthritis pain treatments: Intra-articular hyaluronic acid, intra-articular corticosteroids, and knee arthroplasty

Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Feb 29, 2020

Mackowiak J, et al. - A retrospective analysis of an insurance claims database was designed to compare the medical costs associated with treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA): intra-articular corticosteroids (ICS) and intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IHA) primarily, and ICS/IHA vs knee arthroplasty (TKA) secondarily. The total allowed medical costs, claims for pre-specified, treatment-related adverse outcomes and costs, and opioid and/or prescription analgesic use and costs were the main outcome measures. Of the 260,828 individuals who selected, 126,831 were taking monotherapy (IHA=3,703, ICS=117,588, TKA = 5,540). The results of this research indicated that individuals in the IHA cohort had lower total medical care costs, fewer adverse outcomes, and lower use/costs of opioids and prescription analgesics vs individuals in the ICS and TKA cohorts. When selecting therapies for patients with knee OA, decreasing total medical care costs and minimizing opioid/analgesic use should be a treatment goal.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay