A comparative modeling analysis of risk-based lung cancer screening strategies
Journal of the National Cancer Institute Dec 15, 2019
ten Haaf K, Bastani M, Cao P, et al. - Researchers compared risk-based screening for lung cancer vs current United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations, in terms of long-term benefits and harms. For this purpose, they used four independent natural history models. For a 1950 US birth cohort, they assessed 363 risk-based screening strategies differing by screening initiating and terminating age, risk-prediction model adopted for eligibility (Bach, PLCOm2012, or Lung Cancer Death Risk Assessment Tool), and risk threshold. They found that considerably more lung cancer deaths were prevented by adopting risk-based lung cancer screening strategies vs current recommendations. However, the former yielded modest additional life-years and raised overdiagnosis due to mainly selecting older people. In order to ensure the efficient implementation of risk-based lung cancer screening, there is a need for careful consideration of life expectancy for ascertaining optimal individual stopping ages.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries