Zika surprise: African strain can do more damage than Asian strain
University of Southern California Health News Nov 14, 2017
Ostrow School researcher delves into persistent questions about how the virus can affect the developing brain.
The Zika virus has spread to 44 countries, with thousands infected and thousands of babies born with microcephaly, a rare complication that causes small heads.
Although research dollars are being poured into understanding the virus, there are still numerous questions.
At USC, Assistant Professor Jianfu Chen is working to answer some of those persistent queries. His lab at USCÂs Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology studies the genetic mutations that cause microcephaly.
ÂThere are some genetic deletions in the human population that can cause microcephaly, and we are trying to understand the cause of the defect, said Chen, a researcher at the Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry of USC.
Although microcephaly can occur naturally, Zika can also cause itÂthough the process how isnÂt entirely known.
The origins of Zika can be divided into two lineages: Asian and African. The strain that has caused outbreaksÂand babies born with microcephalyÂin South America and the Caribbean come from the Asian strain of the disease.
There have been no reports of the African origin Zika causing microcephaly, and that was a puzzle, Chen said. The strains are relatively similar, with a difference of only about 110 amino acid bases.
Researchers wanted to know why the strains have different impacts on brain development by doing a side-by-side comparison using the animal model developed from previous studies, he said.
In the new study, Chen injected embryonic mouse brains with Asian and African strains of Zika. Surprisingly, he found that the African Zika virus caused more brain damage and was more likely to kill the baby mice than the Asian strain of the virus. It increased cell death in neuron precursors and neurons, creating smaller, more damaged brains.
The study also found that the dengue virus, a close family member of the Zika virus, also caused smaller brain size, but that the damage was much less than with Zika.
The results of ChenÂs study were published in the journal Development.
So far, there hasnÂt been direct documentation of the African strain causing babies to be born with microcephaly, and that could because the brain damage is so severe that the baby doesnÂt survive pregnancy or early abortion, Chen said.
Another possibility is that in the regions where the African strain exists, women have immunity to the infection before they get pregnant, so the virus doesnÂt cause that much damage to the baby.
A third possibility is that babies are being born with microcephaly, but that the medical recording systems in the countries where itÂs happening arenÂt recording or documenting those events.
ÂWe just donÂt know, said Chen, who hopes to find out more of ZikaÂs secrets in the future.
Go to Original
The Zika virus has spread to 44 countries, with thousands infected and thousands of babies born with microcephaly, a rare complication that causes small heads.
Although research dollars are being poured into understanding the virus, there are still numerous questions.
At USC, Assistant Professor Jianfu Chen is working to answer some of those persistent queries. His lab at USCÂs Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology studies the genetic mutations that cause microcephaly.
ÂThere are some genetic deletions in the human population that can cause microcephaly, and we are trying to understand the cause of the defect, said Chen, a researcher at the Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry of USC.
Although microcephaly can occur naturally, Zika can also cause itÂthough the process how isnÂt entirely known.
The origins of Zika can be divided into two lineages: Asian and African. The strain that has caused outbreaksÂand babies born with microcephalyÂin South America and the Caribbean come from the Asian strain of the disease.
There have been no reports of the African origin Zika causing microcephaly, and that was a puzzle, Chen said. The strains are relatively similar, with a difference of only about 110 amino acid bases.
Researchers wanted to know why the strains have different impacts on brain development by doing a side-by-side comparison using the animal model developed from previous studies, he said.
In the new study, Chen injected embryonic mouse brains with Asian and African strains of Zika. Surprisingly, he found that the African Zika virus caused more brain damage and was more likely to kill the baby mice than the Asian strain of the virus. It increased cell death in neuron precursors and neurons, creating smaller, more damaged brains.
The study also found that the dengue virus, a close family member of the Zika virus, also caused smaller brain size, but that the damage was much less than with Zika.
The results of ChenÂs study were published in the journal Development.
So far, there hasnÂt been direct documentation of the African strain causing babies to be born with microcephaly, and that could because the brain damage is so severe that the baby doesnÂt survive pregnancy or early abortion, Chen said.
Another possibility is that in the regions where the African strain exists, women have immunity to the infection before they get pregnant, so the virus doesnÂt cause that much damage to the baby.
A third possibility is that babies are being born with microcephaly, but that the medical recording systems in the countries where itÂs happening arenÂt recording or documenting those events.
ÂWe just donÂt know, said Chen, who hopes to find out more of ZikaÂs secrets in the future.
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries