Study finds not all women get appropriate care for cervical cancer
University of Michigan Health System Mar 15, 2017
Black, Hispanic women less likely to receive guideline–based care, especially at high–volume hospitals.
Women with locally advanced cervical cancer whose treatment follows national guidelines for care have better survival, regardless of race, ethnicity or stage of cancer. But fewer than three out of five women received guideline–based care. For black and Hispanic women, itÂs just over half, a new study finds. And that could help explain why cervical cancer outcomes tend to be worse for these women.
Researchers looked at records from 16,195 patients treated between 2004 and 2012 for locally advanced cervical cancer. Patient information was reported to the National Cancer Database, which represents 96 percent of the cervical cancer cases in the United States.
To determine whether patients received care in line with national guidelines, the team looked at who received radiation therapy. National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend radiation along with chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Overall, 57 percent of patients received guideline–based care. But those rates varied based on race, from 58 percent in white women to 53 percent in black women and 51 percent in Hispanic women.
What might be most surprising is that a larger gap in guideline–based care was seen among patients treated at centers that saw a large volume of cervical cancer patients, compared to low–volume hospitals.
ÂItÂs a common misconception, says study author Shitanshu Uppal, MBBS, assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Michigan Medicine. Research looking at surgical outcomes suggests high–volume centers help reduce disparities. But treatment recommendations donÂt necessarily improve with practice.
ÂItÂs clear that the more surgeries you do, the better you get. But the Âmore is better mantra may not apply to guideline–concordant care, he says. ÂThese are facilities that know what to do and theyÂre doing it. But theyÂre not doing it consistently across all populations.Â
Over the time period, guideline–based care increased across all populations, but black and Hispanic patients still were less likely than white patients to receive care consistent with guidelines.
ÂOverall, itÂs better for everyone. WeÂre closing the gap, but thereÂs still a gap. Even in 2012, we see a 5 percentage–point gap in guideline–based therapy, Uppal says.
The study, published in the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology, did not address reasons why patients might not have received guideline–based care. Cervical cancer tends to be diagnosed in younger women and more often in women facing socioeconomic issues. These factors could influence a patientÂs likelihood to finish treatment, Uppal suggests. Some patients may refuse certain treatments.
The researchers plan to interview individual patients to better understand the reasons for this disparity, and why there might be barriers to some patients getting treatment.
Not that care will ever be 100 percent aligned with guidelines  there are too many complicated factors for each individual patient. But Uppal expects rates around 75 percent would be a reasonable goal. ThatÂs comparable to other types of cancer.
ÂUnderstanding the Âwhy behind our findings is important  not just for minority populations but for all. We can do better, Uppal says.
Go to Original
Women with locally advanced cervical cancer whose treatment follows national guidelines for care have better survival, regardless of race, ethnicity or stage of cancer. But fewer than three out of five women received guideline–based care. For black and Hispanic women, itÂs just over half, a new study finds. And that could help explain why cervical cancer outcomes tend to be worse for these women.
Researchers looked at records from 16,195 patients treated between 2004 and 2012 for locally advanced cervical cancer. Patient information was reported to the National Cancer Database, which represents 96 percent of the cervical cancer cases in the United States.
To determine whether patients received care in line with national guidelines, the team looked at who received radiation therapy. National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend radiation along with chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Overall, 57 percent of patients received guideline–based care. But those rates varied based on race, from 58 percent in white women to 53 percent in black women and 51 percent in Hispanic women.
What might be most surprising is that a larger gap in guideline–based care was seen among patients treated at centers that saw a large volume of cervical cancer patients, compared to low–volume hospitals.
ÂItÂs a common misconception, says study author Shitanshu Uppal, MBBS, assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Michigan Medicine. Research looking at surgical outcomes suggests high–volume centers help reduce disparities. But treatment recommendations donÂt necessarily improve with practice.
ÂItÂs clear that the more surgeries you do, the better you get. But the Âmore is better mantra may not apply to guideline–concordant care, he says. ÂThese are facilities that know what to do and theyÂre doing it. But theyÂre not doing it consistently across all populations.Â
Over the time period, guideline–based care increased across all populations, but black and Hispanic patients still were less likely than white patients to receive care consistent with guidelines.
ÂOverall, itÂs better for everyone. WeÂre closing the gap, but thereÂs still a gap. Even in 2012, we see a 5 percentage–point gap in guideline–based therapy, Uppal says.
The study, published in the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology, did not address reasons why patients might not have received guideline–based care. Cervical cancer tends to be diagnosed in younger women and more often in women facing socioeconomic issues. These factors could influence a patientÂs likelihood to finish treatment, Uppal suggests. Some patients may refuse certain treatments.
The researchers plan to interview individual patients to better understand the reasons for this disparity, and why there might be barriers to some patients getting treatment.
Not that care will ever be 100 percent aligned with guidelines  there are too many complicated factors for each individual patient. But Uppal expects rates around 75 percent would be a reasonable goal. ThatÂs comparable to other types of cancer.
ÂUnderstanding the Âwhy behind our findings is important  not just for minority populations but for all. We can do better, Uppal says.
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries