IV contrast for CT is not associated with increased risk of acute kidney injury
American College of Emergency Physicians News Feb 12, 2017
Intravenous contrast media (typically iohexol or iodixanol) used in computed tomography (CT) does not appear to be associated with chronic kidney disease, dialysis, kidney transplant or acute kidney injury, despite long–held fears to the contrary. The results of the largest controlled study of acute kidney injury following contrast media administration in the emergency department were published online in the journal Annals of Emergency Medicine (ÂRisk of Acute Kidney Injury Following Intravenous Contrast Media AdministrationÂ).
ÂOver 80 million doses of IV contrast media are administered every year, and in the emergency department it can be essential to accurately diagnose certain acute critical conditions, said lead study author Jeremiah Hinson, MD, PhD, of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Md. ÂBut physicians have had concerns that the contrast media causes serious kidney problems later on, with some studies showing contrast–induced nephropathy occurring in as many as 14 percent of patients receiving it. However, studies used to establish this risk were performed prior to the development of modern contrast reagents or without adequate controls. Using a controlled design in current context, we could not find an association between intravenous contrast media use and acute kidney injury.Â
Researchers studied five years of records for patients receiving CT with or without contrast–enhancement in the emergency department. Of all CT scans, 57.2 percent were contrast–enhanced. The probability of developing acute kidney injury was 6.8 percent for patients undergoing contrast–enhanced CT, 8.9 percent for patients receiving unenhanced CT and 8.1 percent for patients not receiving CT at all.
ÂWhile a well–controlled randomized prospective study is required to fully determine the contribution of intravenous contrast media to the development of acute kidney injury, our results clearly demonstrate that in emergency departments such as ours where practice patterns have evolved to protect patients kidneys, contrast media is not associated with increased risk of kidney injury, said Dr. Hinson. ÂOur data also suggest that in cases where contrast–enhanced CT is indicated to avoid delayed or missed diagnosis of critical disease, the potential morbidity and mortality resulting from a failure to diagnose potentially life–threatening conditions likely outweigh any potential risk of kidney injury.
Go to Original
ÂOver 80 million doses of IV contrast media are administered every year, and in the emergency department it can be essential to accurately diagnose certain acute critical conditions, said lead study author Jeremiah Hinson, MD, PhD, of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Md. ÂBut physicians have had concerns that the contrast media causes serious kidney problems later on, with some studies showing contrast–induced nephropathy occurring in as many as 14 percent of patients receiving it. However, studies used to establish this risk were performed prior to the development of modern contrast reagents or without adequate controls. Using a controlled design in current context, we could not find an association between intravenous contrast media use and acute kidney injury.Â
Researchers studied five years of records for patients receiving CT with or without contrast–enhancement in the emergency department. Of all CT scans, 57.2 percent were contrast–enhanced. The probability of developing acute kidney injury was 6.8 percent for patients undergoing contrast–enhanced CT, 8.9 percent for patients receiving unenhanced CT and 8.1 percent for patients not receiving CT at all.
ÂWhile a well–controlled randomized prospective study is required to fully determine the contribution of intravenous contrast media to the development of acute kidney injury, our results clearly demonstrate that in emergency departments such as ours where practice patterns have evolved to protect patients kidneys, contrast media is not associated with increased risk of kidney injury, said Dr. Hinson. ÂOur data also suggest that in cases where contrast–enhanced CT is indicated to avoid delayed or missed diagnosis of critical disease, the potential morbidity and mortality resulting from a failure to diagnose potentially life–threatening conditions likely outweigh any potential risk of kidney injury.
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries