Impact of reaching U.S. goals for HIV treatment would be massive
Yale School of Medicine News Oct 05, 2017
If the United States were to reach targets for HIV testing and treatment by 2020, the impact, measured by lives saved and new infections prevented over the next 20 years, would be massive.
A new study in The Journal of Infectious Diseases finds that achieving these goals would:
The researchers used a mathematical simulation to project the long-term clinical outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness of reaching nationwide targets for the U.S. response to HIV by 2020, as set out in the U.S. National HIV/AIDS Strategy. Released by the federal government in 2010 and revised in 2015, the strategyÂs goals include a target of 90 percent for the proportion of people in the United States with HIV who know they are infected. Among those diagnosed with HIV infection, the strategy also calls for at least 80 percent to have a viral load that is suppressed by antiretroviral drugs. These goals, if achieved, would mean that 72 percent of people living with HIV have fully suppressed virus, much higher than the current U.S. estimate of 49 percent. The studyÂs findings suggest that reaching these targets by 2020 - and sustaining them into the future - would yield major clinical and economic benefits over the next 20 years. The impact would be particularly striking and extraordinarily cost-effective, the analysis found, in black men who have sex with men, a population hard hit by the HIV epidemic who account for more HIV diagnoses in the United States than any other group, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Achieving these goals, however, will require new, culturally grounded, and non-stigmatizing strategies that address barriers that have to date limited access to HIV testing and treatment in this key population and others, the researchers noted.
ÂWe show for the first time that the most efficient, most cost-effective priority target for HIV prevention, screening and treatment in the United States is black men who have sex with men, said A. David Paltiel, PhD, a co-author of the study and a professor at the Yale School of Public Health. ÂThis is the population that endures the most disproportionate burden of the HIV epidemic but is often the hardest to engage and to retain in care.Â
To cover the costs of reaching the treatment goals outlined in the National HIV/AIDS Strategy and maintaining them, the study finds that the federal HIV budget would need to grow 23 percent - or by approximately 5 percent per year -over the next 20 years. Seventy-five percent of the additional spending would be for antiretroviral drugs, the analysis found, which now cost approximately $40,000 per person, per year. ÂIf drug costs could be reduced by just a third, you could use just those savings alone to pay for this strategy, said the studyÂs first author, Ethan D. Borre of the Medical Practice Evaluation Center at Massachusetts General Hospital.
Go to Original
A new study in The Journal of Infectious Diseases finds that achieving these goals would:
- Avert nearly 200,000 deaths
- Prevent approximately 280,000 new HIV infections
- Save more than 2 million years of life in the United States over the following two decades
- Be affordable and cost effective
The researchers used a mathematical simulation to project the long-term clinical outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness of reaching nationwide targets for the U.S. response to HIV by 2020, as set out in the U.S. National HIV/AIDS Strategy. Released by the federal government in 2010 and revised in 2015, the strategyÂs goals include a target of 90 percent for the proportion of people in the United States with HIV who know they are infected. Among those diagnosed with HIV infection, the strategy also calls for at least 80 percent to have a viral load that is suppressed by antiretroviral drugs. These goals, if achieved, would mean that 72 percent of people living with HIV have fully suppressed virus, much higher than the current U.S. estimate of 49 percent. The studyÂs findings suggest that reaching these targets by 2020 - and sustaining them into the future - would yield major clinical and economic benefits over the next 20 years. The impact would be particularly striking and extraordinarily cost-effective, the analysis found, in black men who have sex with men, a population hard hit by the HIV epidemic who account for more HIV diagnoses in the United States than any other group, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Achieving these goals, however, will require new, culturally grounded, and non-stigmatizing strategies that address barriers that have to date limited access to HIV testing and treatment in this key population and others, the researchers noted.
ÂWe show for the first time that the most efficient, most cost-effective priority target for HIV prevention, screening and treatment in the United States is black men who have sex with men, said A. David Paltiel, PhD, a co-author of the study and a professor at the Yale School of Public Health. ÂThis is the population that endures the most disproportionate burden of the HIV epidemic but is often the hardest to engage and to retain in care.Â
To cover the costs of reaching the treatment goals outlined in the National HIV/AIDS Strategy and maintaining them, the study finds that the federal HIV budget would need to grow 23 percent - or by approximately 5 percent per year -over the next 20 years. Seventy-five percent of the additional spending would be for antiretroviral drugs, the analysis found, which now cost approximately $40,000 per person, per year. ÂIf drug costs could be reduced by just a third, you could use just those savings alone to pay for this strategy, said the studyÂs first author, Ethan D. Borre of the Medical Practice Evaluation Center at Massachusetts General Hospital.
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries