Further reductions in radiotherapy to young children with brain tumors results in less successful outcomes
Children's Hospital Los Angeles news Apr 18, 2017
A team of investigators has determined that young children participating in a clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of reduced radiotherapy did worse when there were deviations from the treatment protocol.
Results of the study were published in the journal Pediatric Blood & Cancer on April 4.
ÂThis study shows that attention to the timing, dose, and location of radiation therapy is crucial, said Kenneth K. Wong, MD, a radiation oncologist at ChildrenÂs Hospital Los Angeles and first author on the study.
This paper is a qualitative assessment of the Head Start III trial which avoids or delays radiation therapy in children with brain tumors. The Head Start studies represent an innovative approach to the treatment of malignant brain tumors  using high dose chemotherapy followed by transfusion of blood stem cells  as a substitute for radiation in younger children, where the late side effects of radiation to the developing brain can be particularly detrimental. If disease persists after this course of treatment or if the child is older, they receive radiation therapy.
In Head Start III, only 31 of 220 children received radiation on study, since the goal of these studies is to reduce radiation exposure. However, of the children who were to receive radiation, a subset (8 of 25) had deviations from the treatment plan. These protocol violations all occurred in children 6 years of age or younger.
ÂParents or providers may want to delay the start of radiation or reduce the dose or area of exposure  particularly in very young children, said Wong. ÂBut in a study already limiting radiation exposure  patients with these kinds of protocol violations experienced worse outcomes.Â
For all patients eligible for radiation therapy, those that received treatment according to protocol and began radiation therapy within 11 weeks of recovery from stem cell transfusion had improved overall survival.
To further improve patient outcomes, Wong suggests focusing on reducing protocol violations by reviewing treatment plans prior to initiating radiation therapy. He is currently pursuing funding to continue this work.
Go to Original
Results of the study were published in the journal Pediatric Blood & Cancer on April 4.
ÂThis study shows that attention to the timing, dose, and location of radiation therapy is crucial, said Kenneth K. Wong, MD, a radiation oncologist at ChildrenÂs Hospital Los Angeles and first author on the study.
This paper is a qualitative assessment of the Head Start III trial which avoids or delays radiation therapy in children with brain tumors. The Head Start studies represent an innovative approach to the treatment of malignant brain tumors  using high dose chemotherapy followed by transfusion of blood stem cells  as a substitute for radiation in younger children, where the late side effects of radiation to the developing brain can be particularly detrimental. If disease persists after this course of treatment or if the child is older, they receive radiation therapy.
In Head Start III, only 31 of 220 children received radiation on study, since the goal of these studies is to reduce radiation exposure. However, of the children who were to receive radiation, a subset (8 of 25) had deviations from the treatment plan. These protocol violations all occurred in children 6 years of age or younger.
ÂParents or providers may want to delay the start of radiation or reduce the dose or area of exposure  particularly in very young children, said Wong. ÂBut in a study already limiting radiation exposure  patients with these kinds of protocol violations experienced worse outcomes.Â
For all patients eligible for radiation therapy, those that received treatment according to protocol and began radiation therapy within 11 weeks of recovery from stem cell transfusion had improved overall survival.
To further improve patient outcomes, Wong suggests focusing on reducing protocol violations by reviewing treatment plans prior to initiating radiation therapy. He is currently pursuing funding to continue this work.
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries