Editorial: Imaging technique for treating heart condition should be more widely adopted to minimize radiation exposure
NewYork-Presbyterian Jun 07, 2017
Researchers from NewYork–Presbyterian and Weill Cornell Medicine advocate for atrial fibrillation procedure that reduces radiation exposure.
A technique to treat an irregular heartbeat that limits or eliminates patients exposure to radiation should be more widely adopted by physicians, NewYork–Presbyterian and Weill Cornell Medicine cardiologists argue in a new review article in the journal Heart Rhythm. They posit that the primary obstacle to the procedureÂs widespread use  physicians discomfort with a different visual tool  can be overcome with training and experience.
To guide catheter ablation, many cardiologists rely on an imaging technique called fluoroscopy that uses a continuous X–ray beam to visualize the heart. While effective, the technique exposes both the care team and patient to high doses of radiation.
ÂThe amount of fluoroscopy received by a patient during a routine AF ablation procedure is estimated to be the equivalent of the dose of radiation a patient would receive with 830 X–rays, said lead author Dr. Bruce Lerman, chief of the Division of Cardiology and director of the Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratory at NewYork–Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center and Weill Cornell Medicine, where he is also the H. Altschul Master Professor of Medicine. ÂIn our hands, the vast majority of AF patients do not require fluoroscopy, resulting in no radiation exposure to the patient or the electrophysiologist performing the procedure.Â
To accomplish fluoroless catheter ablation, the NewYork–Presbyterian and Weill Cornell Medicine team use technology that emits high–frequency sound waves, known as intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), to create a complete and precise image of the heart. In addition, the use of computerized three–dimensional mapping systems and pre–procedural cardiac imaging can further guide the procedure. Weill Cornell Medicine electrophysiologists believe that physicians around the country can embrace fluoroless ablation of atrial fibrillation by challenging entrenched practices.
ÂAlthough the concept of fluoroless catheter ablation was introduced several years ago, it has yet to gain wide adoption, mostly because many electrophysiologists were trained to rely on X–ray imaging and are reluctant to trust ICE, said co–author Dr. Jim Cheung, director of clinical electrophysiology research and cardiac electrophysiology fellowship training at NewYork–Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center and associate professor of medicine at Weill Cornell Medicine. Dr. Cheung is a consultant for and has received fellowship grant support from Biosense Webster, a manufacturer of electrophysiology devices. ÂThis concern can be remedied with experience. For some, the learning curve can be steep, but generally, the skill set can be readily acquired. By thoughtfully modifying the way the procedure is performed, we can significantly reduce the radiation risk in the process.Â
ÂWe are currently training our fellows to utilize this technique in an effort to guide the next generation of cardiologists to become well–versed in fluoroless ablation, Dr. Cheung said.
ÂThe most critical requisite for performing fluoroless catheter ablation of AF is a willingness to relinquish an old habit, said Dr. Lerman, who is also a consultant for Biosense Webster. ÂDoing so will have a tremendous advantage for both patients and healthcare professionals.Â
Go to Original
A technique to treat an irregular heartbeat that limits or eliminates patients exposure to radiation should be more widely adopted by physicians, NewYork–Presbyterian and Weill Cornell Medicine cardiologists argue in a new review article in the journal Heart Rhythm. They posit that the primary obstacle to the procedureÂs widespread use  physicians discomfort with a different visual tool  can be overcome with training and experience.
To guide catheter ablation, many cardiologists rely on an imaging technique called fluoroscopy that uses a continuous X–ray beam to visualize the heart. While effective, the technique exposes both the care team and patient to high doses of radiation.
ÂThe amount of fluoroscopy received by a patient during a routine AF ablation procedure is estimated to be the equivalent of the dose of radiation a patient would receive with 830 X–rays, said lead author Dr. Bruce Lerman, chief of the Division of Cardiology and director of the Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratory at NewYork–Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center and Weill Cornell Medicine, where he is also the H. Altschul Master Professor of Medicine. ÂIn our hands, the vast majority of AF patients do not require fluoroscopy, resulting in no radiation exposure to the patient or the electrophysiologist performing the procedure.Â
To accomplish fluoroless catheter ablation, the NewYork–Presbyterian and Weill Cornell Medicine team use technology that emits high–frequency sound waves, known as intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), to create a complete and precise image of the heart. In addition, the use of computerized three–dimensional mapping systems and pre–procedural cardiac imaging can further guide the procedure. Weill Cornell Medicine electrophysiologists believe that physicians around the country can embrace fluoroless ablation of atrial fibrillation by challenging entrenched practices.
ÂAlthough the concept of fluoroless catheter ablation was introduced several years ago, it has yet to gain wide adoption, mostly because many electrophysiologists were trained to rely on X–ray imaging and are reluctant to trust ICE, said co–author Dr. Jim Cheung, director of clinical electrophysiology research and cardiac electrophysiology fellowship training at NewYork–Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center and associate professor of medicine at Weill Cornell Medicine. Dr. Cheung is a consultant for and has received fellowship grant support from Biosense Webster, a manufacturer of electrophysiology devices. ÂThis concern can be remedied with experience. For some, the learning curve can be steep, but generally, the skill set can be readily acquired. By thoughtfully modifying the way the procedure is performed, we can significantly reduce the radiation risk in the process.Â
ÂWe are currently training our fellows to utilize this technique in an effort to guide the next generation of cardiologists to become well–versed in fluoroless ablation, Dr. Cheung said.
ÂThe most critical requisite for performing fluoroless catheter ablation of AF is a willingness to relinquish an old habit, said Dr. Lerman, who is also a consultant for Biosense Webster. ÂDoing so will have a tremendous advantage for both patients and healthcare professionals.Â
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries