• Profile
Close

ACEP: Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield policy in Ohio puts patients at risk

American College of Emergency Physicians News Dec 23, 2017

The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and its Ohio Chapter (Ohio ACEP) today came out against a policy that Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) plans to implement in the state on January 1st, in which emergency patients who have been treated in emergency departments may be responsible for all the costs, if the insurer decides after-the-fact it was not an emergency, based on a list of diagnoses.

"This violates the prudent layperson standard, which is part of Medicare and Medicaid laws, as well as the Affordable Care Act, and requires coverage to be based on a patient's symptoms rather than a diagnosis," said Purva Grover, MD, FACEP, president of Ohio ACEP. "This policy is dangerous, because Ohioans who really need emergency care may be too afraid to seek care."

Dr. Grover said that one of the diagnoses that would not be covered is "rash." However, there are serious or potentially fatal conditions, such as Lyme disease or endocarditis from opioid injection, that first can manifest as a simple rash. Ruling out life-threatening conditions requires a careful history and physical exam by a provider familiar with such ailments. Physicians fear the unintended outcome of Anthem's policy will be to discourage people from seeking medical care in the first place.

"Health insurance companies can't expect patients to know which symptoms are life-threatening and which ones are not, and they shouldn't be punished financially because of it," said Dr. Grover. "Emergency physicians treat patients every day with identical symptoms—some go home, some need a medical procedure, and some need to be admitted. Only a full medical work-up can determine that."

For over 20 years, the "prudent layperson" law has been the standard for determining whether evaluation at an emergency department is justified. This standard requires that insurance coverage is based on a patient's symptoms, not their final diagnosis. Anyone who seeks emergency care suffering from symptoms that appear to be an emergency should not be denied coverage if the final diagnosis does not turn out to be an emergency. The BCBS policy violates this standard. Anthem BCBS has already implemented this policy in several states including, Missouri, Georgia, and Kentucky, with a much larger list of conditions. New Hampshire and Indiana are scheduled to be under the Anthem policy by early next year and others could follow.

According to a recent ACEP poll, more than 4 in 10 Americans reported that they delayed or avoided seeking emergency care in the past 2 years out of concerns about the cost of co-pays, co-insurance, and deductibles. Nearly half said their medical condition worsened as a result.

"Health plans have a long history of not paying for emergency care," said Paul Kivela, MD, MBA, FACEP, president of ACEP. "For years, they have denied claims based on final diagnosis instead of symptoms. Emergency physicians successfully fought back against these outrageous policies. Now, as the future of health care is debated again, insurance companies are trying to reintroduce the practice."

Dr. Kivela added that there is nearly a 90% overlap in symptoms between emergencies and non-emergencies, according to a 2013 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay